This is a
subject that usually generates some confusion when I talk about it in my classes.
The reason is very simple... many of my students have learned that when a NADH
molecule transfers the electrons to the mitochondrial respiratory chain, it is formed
3 ATP, and when it is the FADH2 the donor of the electrons it is produced 2
ATP. When I say in my classes that are in fact 2.5 ATP produced when the
electron donor is NADH, and 1.5 when it is the FADH2, there are many students who
make a puzzled face. By the way, let me just make a correction to something
that I hear very often. It is not correct to say that NADH is converted in 2.5
ATP, instead it should be said that NADH leads to the production of 2.5 ATP,
since NADH is not spent on the process and it only gives two electrons. But
back to the energy efficiency... another thing that often causes confusion when
I talk about the production of 2.5 ATP, is the fact that you are talking about
"one half of an ATP". But how do we produce "half ATP"? And
what does the chemical point of view of "half ATP"? In reality it is
a strange and confusing idea but the justification is very simple. As it is
logical, no one produces “half ATP”, what is happening is that the energy
released during the transport of electrons along the mitochondrial respiratory
chain is sufficient to produce in average ATP 2.5 or 1.5 (depending if the
donor of the electrons is NADH or FADH2, respectively). As the process is
continuous, the sum of the energy released per a second electron donor is
sufficient to ensure one ATP together.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb45f/eb45f60f3eee47d179a8242dc13a9310c6a55d8e" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment